Implementation of Analytic Hierarchy Process for Sustainable Municipal Solid Waste Management: a Case Study of Bangkok

Nayseang Sun, Supachart Chungpaibulpatana, Bundit Limmeechokchai

Abstract


Municipal solid waste (MSW) is considered as one of the renewable energy sources in Thailand, and MSW management is a challenging issue due to its complicated structure that relevant to environmental and socio-economic condition, especially in developing countries. This study aims to review the current status to highlight issues of MSW management in Bangkok, Thailand, then to analyze the situation in order to propose suitable waste treatment technologies for Bangkok based on data/information analysis. To reach the milestone, the interviewing of local administrators and experts in field of waste treatment technologies as well as reviewing of relevant documents are needed. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method is implemented to evaluate a sustainable MSW management for Bangkok by considering a sustainability model that is associated with environmental, social and economic aspects. The result indicates that 90% of total waste generation in Bangkok are collected. Out of MSW collected in Bangkok, 10% was composted in On-Nut transfer station, 3% was incinerated in Nong Khaem transfer station, and the other 87% was sent to landfills outside Bangkok. On the other hand, results of AHP analyses show the preferred technology for Bangkok while sensitivity analysis determines the variation of technologies ranking when the weight of criteria changes. The study also suggests the integrated systems for sustainable development. The first integrated system, composting (CP) and gasification (GF), is preferable in case there are market opportunities for compost products. On the other hand, an anaerobic digestion (AD) and gasification (GF) system is preferable if the stakeholders give more importance to biogas production and electricity generation. The outcomes are thought to provide benefits for the policymakers, investors, researchers, and other stakeholders in Bangkok and elsewhere.

Keywords


analytic hierarchy process (AHP); Bangkok; priorities ranking; sustainable municipal solid waste management; waste treatment technology

Full Text:

PDF

References


Hoornweg D. and P. Bhada-Tata. 2012. What a Waste: A Global Review of Solid Waste Management. Washington, DC: World Bank. Retrieved from the World Wide Web: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/17388.

United Nations Environment Programme, 2015. Global Waste Management Outlook. Retrieved on July 01, 2017 from the World Wide Web: http://www.unep.org/ietc/Portals/136/Publications/Waste%20Management/GWMO%20report/GWMO_report.pdf.

Chanhthamixay B., Vassanadumrongdee S., and Kittipongvises S., 2017. Assessing the sustainability level of municipal solid waste management in Bangkok, Thailand by wasteaware benchmarking indicators. Applied Environmental Research 39(3): 49–61.

Taboada-González P., Aguilar-Virgen Q., Ojeda-Benítez S., and Cruz-Sotelo S., 2014. Application of analytic hierarchy process in a waste treatment technology assessment in Mexico. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 186: 5777–5795.

Intharathirat R. and P.A. Salam. 2016. Valorization of MSW–to–energy in Thailand: Status, challenges and prospects. Waste and Biomass Valorization 7: 31–57.

Bangkok Post, 2014. Air emergency at dump site (updated). Bangkok: Bangkok Post Group. Retrieved from the World Wide Web: https://www.bangkokpost.com/learning/learning-news/400267/dump-fire-lights-samut-prakan-skies.

Soltani A., Hewage K., Reza B., and Sadiq R., 2015. Multiple stakeholders in multi-criteria decision-making in the context of municipal solid waste management: A review. Waste Management 35: 318–328.

Milutinović B., Stefanović G., Dassisti M., Marković D., and Vučković G., 2014. Multi-criteria analysis as a tool for sustainability assessment of a waste management model. Energy 74: 190–201.

Boonkanit P. and S. Kantharos. 2016. An AHP for prioritizing and selecting industrial waste management method case study: Map Ta Phut Industrial Estate. Applied Mechanics and Materials 848: 251–254.

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.848.251.

Intharathirat R. and P. Abdul Salam. 2020. Analytical Hierarchy Process-Based Decision Making for Sustainable MSW Management Systems in Small and Medium Cities. In: Ghosh S. (eds) Sustainable Waste Management: Policies and Case Studies. Singapore: Springer https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7071-7_55.

Ismail K., Shahid A., Adul B., Kuaanan T., and Warangkana J., 2019. Municipal solid waste landfill siting using an integrated GIS-AHP approach: A case study from Songkhla, Thailand. Resource, Conservation and Recycling 149: 220–235.

National Statistical Office, 2017. Number and percentage of population by sex, region and area (2015-2016). Retrieved July 11, 2017 from the World Wide Web:

http://web.nso.go.th/en/survey/popchan/data/2015-2016-Statistical%20tables%20PDF.pdf.

World Bank, 2020. The World Bank in Thailand. Bangkok: World Bank. Retrieved from the World Wide Web: https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/thailand/overview.

Sivakumar K. and M. Sugirtharan. 2010. Impact of family income and size on per capita solid waste generation: A case study in Manmunai North Divisional Secretariat Division of Batticaloa. Journal of Science of University of Kelaniya Sri Lanka 5: 13–23.

Pollution Control Department. 2016. State of municipal solid waste of Thailand, 2016. Retrieved May 16, 2017 from the World Wide Web: http://www.pcd.go.th/public/Publications/printreport.cfm?task=wsthaz_annual59.

Okumura S., Tasaki T., Moriguchi Y., and Jangprajak W., 2017. Economic growth and selection of municipal waste treatment options in Bangkok. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management 19: 718-730.

Wannawilai P., Poboon C., and Maneein J., 2017. Analysis of solid waste management and strategies for Bangkok Metropolitan. Environment and Natural Resources Journal 15(2): 1–12.

Stefanovic G., Milutinovic B., Vucicevic B., Dencic-Mihajlov K., and Turanjanin V., 2016. A comparison of the analytic hierarchy process and the analysis and synthesis of parameters under information deficiency method for assessing the sustainability of waste management scenarios. Journal of Cleaner Production 130: 155–165.

Saaty T.L., 2008. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences 1: 83–98.

Ouda O., Raza S., Nizami A., Rehan M., Al-Waked R., and Korres N., 2016. Waste to energy potential: A case study of Saudi Arabia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 61: 328–340.

Post Today, 2017. SPP Hybrid Firm. Bangkok: Bangkok Post Group from the World Wide Web: https://www.posttoday.com/economy/news/483490.

Nithikul J., 2007. Potential of refuse derived fuel production from Bangkok Municipal Solid Waste. M. Eng. Thesis. Asian Institute of Technology, Pathum Thani, Thailand.

Longden D., Brammer J., Bastin L., and Cooper N., 2007. Distributed or centralised energy-from-waste policy? Implications of technology and scale at municipal level. Energy Policy 35: 2622–2634.

Menikpura S., Sang-Arun J., and Bengtsson M., 2013. Integrated solid waste management: an approach for enhancing climate co-benefits through resource recovery. Journal of Cleaner Production 58: 34–42.

Nixon J.D., Dey P., Ghosh S., and Davies P., 2013. Evaluation of options for energy recovery from municipal solid waste in India using the hierarchical analytical network process. Energy 59: 215–223.

Sang-Arun J., 2010. Integrate food waste management for climate change mitigation in developing asian countries. Institute for Global Environment Strategies. Retrieved May 18, 2018 from the World Wide Web: http://slideplayer.com/slide/3758737/.

Munda G., 2002. Social multi-criteria evaluation. In the Proceedings of the 4th UFZ Summer Symposium: New Strategies for Solving Environmental Conflicts: Potentials for Combining Participation and Multicriteria Analysis, Leipzig, 26–28 June, 2002.